[2012081] Stephen K Amos – Laughter is My Agenda!

[2012081] Stephen K Amos – Laughter is My Agenda!

Stephen K Amos @ Arts Theatre

5:00pm, Sun 4 Mar 2012

It’s been a few years since I’d thrown some money in the general direction of Stephen K Amos – he’s always on The Shortlist whenever he’s in town, but is often dropped because… well, I’ll generally favour something new over something familiar. That’s not to say that Amos retreads the same ground with his comedy… just that you know exactly what to expect from one of his shows.

For example, he susses his front couple of rows out very early on, and zeroes in on the person who gives him a witless answer to one of his questions; that person becomes the Callback for the entire show, with Amos conjuring humorous derision incredibly well. This evening’s Callback, Alistair, squirmed into his front-row seat a few minutes late. Incredulous, Amos demanded to know why an eighteen-year-old would be so late to a show – does he have a demanding job? No, replied Alistair, I “do nothing.” “Nothing?” raved Amos, “What does that mean? Where do you go in the morning after you wake up?”

“The kitchen,” came the answer, cementing Alistair the Callback position for the evening.

But there were other audience members who made Amos’ job easy; the guy who forgot to turn his phone off copped a river of faux rage. And one chap, sitting at the rear of the Arts, felt obliged to yell out a slightly delayed “no” anytime Amos queried the entire audience – “any Nigerians in the house tonight?” was followed by “are you enjoying yourself?” for a self-denigratory laugh.

It’s just as well Amos is quick on his feet dealing with unruly audience members, though, because the rest of this evening’s show felt remarkably lacklustre (by the standards I’ve come to expect of him). There’s some early Clipsal-related gags, references to the Gillard/Rudd kerfuffle, and some audience interaction bits (focusing on mixed-race children), before he settles into somewhat familiar work revolving around his family. To be fair, he did explain that he was trialling new material, and he was often able to elicit a laugh from picking up his notes and crossing jokes out with an extravagant flourish… but there was still a little something missing from the content this evening.

As an aside, Amos mentions that on the opening night of this season, an audience member had (in response to a comment on Obama’s racial heritage) yelled out “Oi Stephen, Obama’s mum was white, you c#nt” – and, as much as I dislike that much audience protrusion into a show, I almost wish I’d caught that show instead. That’s not to say that Amos has lost his touch – he’s still one of the quickest and most disarming comedians around, able to make you laugh hysterically whilst feeling thankful he’s not picking on you… it’s just that something was lacking in this timeslot.

[2012080] Aluka

[2012080] Aluka

Aluka @ Format (Basement)

3:00pm, Sun 4 Mar 2012

In retrospect, I don’t know what I was thinking scheduling Aluka on the same day as Jane Austen is Dead; even in the most optimal of conditions, a ten-minute hike from the Bakehouse to Format is pretty tough going. As a result, I’m running (literally) late, and I’m so glad of my shoes as I quietly pad down the stairs, gently buffeted by (what seemed to be) the sounds of angels coming from the basement.

The rough-hewn basement is packed with people of all ages, though there seemed to be a fair few families present; as I find my own little space at the back of the room, I check the crowd out. The adults are rapt, utterly engaged in what was being performed for them; even the small children seemed to cease their aimless squirming when Aluka were singing.

Aluka are a three-girl a cappella group from Melbourne, who perform on the very quiet end of the spectrum. Their songs are mostly performed very softly, with a delicacy that is utterly enchanting; breathy, airy passages are occasionally underpinned by gentle beatboxing percussion that is almost adorable. They are completely unafraid of letting silence work for them, of making the audience strain for the next note…

And their voices are gorgeous – sometimes pure and sweet, other times desperately sad and softly broken. Songs are largely folky in nature, varying tempos well measured by the girls; compositions usually focus on overlapping vocals, with some songs seeing each of the girls singing mere syllables, with entire words seemingly coalescing from nowhere. But, whilst I realise I’m painting a ridiculously twee memory of the show, there were some fantastic bits of humour in the delivery too – though one such moment was completely fortuitous, with the phone of one of the girls blurting out a perfectly timed text message notification at the end of their second song.

Look – I loved Aluka. Stunning voices, clever compositions, and a purity and sweetness that was a pleasure to revel in. I highly recommend checking out their first EP; while it lacks the spontaneity of a live performance, it shows off the group’s style wonderfully.

[2012079] Jane Austen is Dead

[2012079] Jane Austen is Dead

BRAVE Theatre @ Bakehouse Theatre – Studio

2:00pm, Sun 4 Mar 2012

Sure, the Bakehouse’s Studio is a relatively small space (it only seats about forty people), but there was a decent crowd in for this matinée – especially for a bright-yet-sticky Sunday afternoon. The set is simple: a bookcase that contained a couple of books, a collection of glasses, and a small bar were all that adorned the stage.

We soon meet Sophie, who owns and runs this Jane Austen-themed bar, left to her by her father (a self-confessed Jane Austen tragic). Sophie’s 33 years old, single, and her most significant ex-boyfriend is getting married tomorrow… and his bride-to-be’s hen’s night has just stepped into her bar. She laments her own singledom by comparing the significant men in her life to those that appear in Austen’s novels; her “Mr Darcy” is proving to be elusive, with the contenders providing comic fodder galore (her romantic dalliances in the schoolyard were a particular source of mirth). She also reflects on the seven stages of desperation, and her own loneliness is contrasted by her ditzy assistant Mary, who spends her “working” hours waiting for a text message from her cousin… a desperate date.

Mel Dodge is absolutely wonderful onstage in this solo outing: her acting was superb (despite their physical absence, it felt like Mary and The Bride were onstage with her), she’s as cute as a bug’s ear, and her Kiwi accent is to die for… hearing her lament “it’s fucking fiction” in authentic vowel-transliterated Kiwese remains a highlight of my Fringe. Her script is wonderful fun; whilst I’m no Austen aficionado, I could sense that it’s chock-full of in-jokes – but that certainly didn’t stop me from having a great old laugh. The contrast between the men in her life and the characters on the page is stark – there’s little nobility on offer, and even less genteel romanticism… but her characters’ unbridled hope – coupled with an almost reluctant pragmatism – remains utterly charming throughout.

Jane Austen is Dead was a real gem: a great script, presented by a talented actress, that left me feeling totally smitten. Brava!

[2012078] Exhibit Amy

[2012078] Exhibit Amy

Amy Bodossian @ Ambassadors Hotel

10:30pm, Sat 3 Mar 2012

I’ve rocked up at Queen’s Theatre to see Horse, grabbed a drink, and sat down to pound out some notes; the venue is dead, with my presence increasing the head-count in the foyer area by 50%. I start chatting to the front-of-house minder – she eyes the empty space, and tells me that performer Flick Ferdinando is feeling ill… Horse may not be on. I immediately pull out my phone and start checking for something else on my shortlist.

Fifteen minutes before the scheduled start time, the cancellation is confirmed: I smile, ask for my best wishes to be passed on to Flick (whilst passive-aggressively indicating that I probably wouldn’t be able to see the show on another day), and scoot around to Ambassadors to see Exhibit Amy.

There’s only about some-teen people in for the show this evening, and – with the exception of a table near the front that provided a haven for two gigglish couples – the audience seemed to be completely comprised of older men with scruffy hair, all of whom elected to sit as far from the stage’s light bleed as possible. I swear that a couple of them even had trench-coats on to complete the “dirty old man” look; I can only hope that I didn’t appear to fall into that category as well.

As her accompanist tinkled some electric ivories, Amy Bodossian stumbles through the audience from the back of the room, clad only in a night-shirt. She occasionally stops at tables, handing out pencils and posing for people, encouraging them to sketch her; eventually, she makes it onto the stage and launches (well, ambles – and I mean that in the best way possible) into her opening song, the titular Exhibit Amy.

From there, Amy ducks and weaves through an hour of material, scooting between spoken word, song, and poetry; all the while she’s gradually getting dressed for a night out, donning underwear(!), a sleek black cocktail dress, and gorgeous heels. It feels like she’s working with a very loose framework, with her songs and readings allowing her the ability to inject quick little asides without ruining the flow of proceedings (for which her accompanist – on keys, drums, and guitar – also deserves credit). And that makes the act feel vibrant and exciting; you’re convinced that pretty much anything could happen.

The only problem for me was that the style of delivery was very reminiscent of last year’s show, Phlegm Fatale… as was some of the material (the lustful tale of the ladybug and grasshopper, and the strikingly masculine I Want You). And that familiarity threatens to take the edge off that loose feeling of freedom… but that’s most definitely my problem, not Amy’s.

Exhibit Amy felt a little rough on the night: it seemed that Amy was still working some of the kinks out of her material and blocking, and there were a few speaker cut-outs and gear problems. But none of that can change the fact that I am equal parts smitten and scared by Amy; I adore her physicality, her dirty words, and her confidence… and I’m terrified by her blunt sexuality and confidence. And that makes for a squirmingly entertaining experience.

[2012077] Proximity

[2012077] Proximity

Australian Dance Theatre @ Her Majesty’s Theatre

8:00pm, Sat 3 Mar 2012

I’ve been feeling increasingly miffed with the ADT’s output in recent years; but when I look back through my archives, I’ve no idea why. Sure, I thought that 2006’s Devolution was arse, but I skipped over G completely, and then there’s nothing else until 2004’s Held, which was really quite wonderful… so I’ve got no real explanation for my escalating dissatisfaction with their work.

It turned out, however, that my unexplainable inclinations were spot-on.

House lights drop; the audience hushes. A spotlight snaps on, picking out a video camera sitting atop a wheeled tripod in the middle of the stage. Stage lights mounted lower down snap on and off in sequence, casting clean shadows from the tripod – oooooh, the shadows are dancing. Initially, I’m somewhat taken in by this; it’s a clever foreshadowing of what is to come, I thought… and, after all, I love my light’n’shadow.

But this sequence just keeps going and going and going… it feels interminable, and – worse – it’s adding nothing after the initial impact. In fact, it’s sapping my good will away – my mood descends entirely into the negative.

And there I mope for most of the performance, as cameras are heavily used to manipulate the form (and effectively control the function) of the ADT’s dancers (once they take to the stage, clad in bold colours). As the dancers perform their movements, the cameras capture them, with various effects – time-delayed image trails, snapshots, wireframe detection – applied through software before being presented to us on a screen at the rear of the stage.

This sort of melding of dance and image processing has been seen in the Festival before: Chunky Move’s Glow was an entertaining, but unsatisfying, piece of performance art back in 2008. So none of this technology really feels new… and, in fact, it really hurts the piece.

Because there’s short fragments of movement, wedged between technological set-pieces, which allow the dancers to perform their choreography without the watchful eye of an onstage camera… and they’re really quite enjoyable, focussing on all the wide stances and deft hand movements and harsh angles that epitomise the ADT to me. The final piece, in particular, was really really good – but then the whole thing becomes tainted once pre-recorded footage of other dancers jumping and falling starts staining the screen behind them. Not only did the footage distract from the more immediate performance, but it was displaying horrible compression artefacts… and that just shows a lack of respect to the audience.

From the ludicrous intro to the bitter ending, Proximity felt like a real mish-mash of ideas… most of which seemed to be exercises in self-indulgence that alienated this audience member, who remained steadfastly un-engaged for 99% of the show. I can’t help but think that the ADT would be a lot better off if they forgot about the techy themes and stuck to some dancing, rather than piss-farting around with wireframe-marionette simulations and having dancers framing shots for the camera with their fingers.

But, let’s face it, at this stage “ADT” stands for “Asinine Dicking with Technology”… and that’s a massive shame, because the actual dancers are bloody great. And, despite the fact that Her Majesty’s was maybe only half full (certainly the dress circle was sparsely populated, and the front two rows – and much of the wings – of the stalls were empty), that didn’t stop some (younger) enthusiasts in the audience from screaming up a storm upon the show’s completion… the dancers (and presumably video artist Thomas Pachoud) were permitted four curtain calls. I can only assume that the rampant applause and hollering was because this was their final performance of the season; the other option, of course, is that I’m horribly out of touch with what constitutes good “dance”.

[2012076] I Can Keep A Secret

[2012076] I Can Keep A Secret

Babushka @ Dragonfly Bar + Dining

6:00pm, Sat 3 Mar 2012

Ah, the Dragonfly. It’s a regular lunchtime haunt when I’m unfortunate enough to be working on a Friday, with boozy lunches centred around their stunning Nori chicken, and their evening fare is fantastic too… but, despite the fact they regularly have some DJ sets of interest, I’ve never dragged myself there to see a show. Visual arts displays, yes, but not an actual gig per se.

Turning up on the cusp of “late” was probably not a great idea; Dragonfly was packed, and – with the four women of Babushka (and their male pianist) down the far end of the room – it was a bit of a struggle for me to peer through the fading light and bobbing heads to see the performance.

But you know what? It didn’t matter – because it sounded awesome.

Using the flimsy pretence of sharing their innermost secrets, Babushka – four classically trained sopranos brought together by their common diagnosis of Soprano Identity Crisis Syndrome – belted out some frankly astonishing arrangements of material both contemporary and classical. Opening with a gorgeously layered rendition of Confide In Me, their (unaided) voices filled Dragonfly easily: pure, soaring notes made the hair on the back of my neck stand on end… thrilling stuff! The contemporary cabaret favourite, Glory Box, soon followed, and was no less impressive; I Want To Be Evil also got a wonderful airing.

It’s a gorgeous presentation to behold, with the women all clad in beautiful dresses of primary colours. Laura (green) excelled during the more classically operatic moments of the show; Bethan (blue) stunned with incredibly high notes during Glory Box, and also provided string support on violin; Alicia (red), the musical director for the group, still belted the notes out whilst pregnant; and Michelle (yellow) had no problems matching any of the others in volume or tone. Whilst they all had fantastic solo moments, it was the moments where their voices coalesced – such as during their namesake Babooshka – that really impressed.

Between songs, the girls maintain the secrecy theme by imparting their own little tales laced with humour, including some of the Secret Rules of Soprano: “no sex before auditions,” they were taught, “but blowjobs are okay – they open up the throat.” Michelle lets slip details of her “tasteful” photo shoots, Alicia quietly drops snippets about her pregnancy, and even their pianist gets in on the act: “last night I finally slept with a woman,” he confides, “…Definitely gay.”

And whilst the humorous asides were effective and crowd-pleasing (the latex-snapping Silence of the Lambs touch was giggle-worthy, too), they aren’t going to be the lingering memories of Babushka. Instead, I’m going to be clinging onto that wonderful sense of theatricality, a Dragonfly that was bubbling with positivity, a killer closing song in White Wedding, and those stunning voices. Oh my, those voices.

[2012075] L.O.V

[2012075] L.O.V

The Chiral Collective @ Queen’s Theatre 2

3:00pm, Sat 3 Mar 2012

As I leave the Main Theatre at AC Arts after Executive Stress / Corporate Retreat, I realise there’s a tiny chance I could squeeze in another shortlisted show; I just had to make it across Light Square in ninety seconds. With a bit of traffic-dodging (and a thankfully late start), I found myself gulping air (then water) as I slid into my seat as the house lights dropped.

What followed was a patchy deliberation of male intimacy, which intended to portray the fractured relationships between boy/man James and his father, alongside the peer-driven mateship of three friends (as James is joined by Max and Ali). When James and Ali are drawn into a fight that ends in the death of another, leading to James’ imprisonment for manslaughter, relationships are strained by the expectations of silence that the stereotypical mateship infers. James’ release from prison, and the contrast between characters over the duration of his incarceration, brings those relationships into stark relief…

Whilst the premise of the play is simple enough, its production is patchy – largely due to an uneven script that regularly swaps between the (amazing!) poetic delivery of inner monologues, to the clumsy (and even amateurish) dialogue between characters. There’s a bit of confusion initially as Fabio Motta plays both James’ father and Max, but Motta was (by far) the best actor on stage, and managed to carry the two roles. But as a central character, Joseph Appleton’s Ali left a bit to be desired, with no real emotion behind his delivery… making the denouement, in which the seemingly powerful bonds of friendship and trust are shattered in an inexplicable instant, all the more unbelievable.

L.O.V has an idea about what it’s trying to achieve, but seems to get lost somewhere along the way. What starts out as a reasonably straightforward look at the social confines of male relationships is let down by an ending which is absolutely unbelievable, and almost completely out of character. Maybe a different performer could have carried the closing scenes in a more credible manner, but I suspect it’s more a case of an awkward script that didn’t quite know how to wrap itself up.

[2012074] Executive Stress / Corporate Retreat

[2012074] Executive Stress / Corporate Retreat

Applespiel @ Adelaide College of the Arts – Main Theatre

2:00pm, Sat 3 Mar 2012

Intrigued by the promise of self-help theatre (and god knows I need plenty of help), I patiently waited in line near the allotted start time. Several young, well-dressed people came out and announced that the first ten people in the queue were able to enter the “elite programme” – and I was the lucky tenth person in line.

And tenth I stayed throughout the experience… but more on that later.

There’s an initial exercise – simple yes/no answers to rapid-fire questions – for those in the elite programme while we’re still in the foyer; we’re separated into the ominously named Alpha and Delta groups. Naturally, I found myself cast into the Deltas, and with the teams decided we filed into the Main Theatre, where the elite programme had their front-row seats reserved… with a couple of dozen non-elite spectators sitting behind.

It very quickly became evident that the eight members of the business-attired Applespiel (five men, three women) were trying to foster a competitive environment, as they explained the rules of engagement to us whilst performing a beep test. Not only were we elites expected to compete against each other – both as individuals and as teams – but there were also distinct elements of friction between the purveyors of this exercise; one of the women, in particular, became the focus of many snarls and snapped insults, all wrapped up in ludicrous corporate-speak.

The elite programme members didn’t spend much time spectating from our seats, though; more often than not, we were lined up and facing the audience whilst undergoing “tests”. Starting out with simple job interview questions, each trial was scored, with a leaderboard displaying the results at the end of each exercise. This had the undoubtedly desired effect of increasing the sense of competition between us; I remember fuming because my Double-Windsor tie-knot was undoubtedly superior to my neighbour’s scrawny mess, and he was verbally ranked “excellent” opposed to my slap-in-the-face “good”.

In fact, I became convinced that the early leader – Wayne, an Alpha (of course!) – was a plant. He seemed to be garnering massive amounts of respect and approval from our facilitators for merely average output; so during a team exercise, where both teams had to build spaceships from a boxful of stationary supplies, I hatched a plan to guarantee Delta’s success, resulting in Wayne being de-throned from the leaderboard – “we’re stealing all the parts,” I told the team.

So we did, garnering an “excellent… and innovative” response. Unfortunately, Alpha’s colossal failure was still deemed “excellent”-worthy… our innovation had been for nothing, with Alpha Team dominating the top rankings on the leader board, and me finishing dead last.

Executive Stress / Corporate Retreat may have been a lot of fun for those watching, especially during the “animal meditation” exercise… but I certainly had my competitive hackles raised, and that’s not necessarily a pleasurable thing for me. But it was an insightful – if not cynical – look at those professional relationships that I would certainly not choose to engage in, and it left me with plenty to think about; in retrospect, I reckon this is a performance I would’ve enjoyed more from the audience, rather than the stage.

Barrio – Hazy Memories from Opening Night

After the last decade-and-a-bit of seeing squillions of Fringe and Festival shows, I’ve come to the conclusion that I love Art. And, because I figure that the best way I can ensure that I’ll continue having the chance to enjoy Art is to patronise it, I feel obliged to put my money where my mouth is: I pay for tickets. I go to fund raisers. And I am a proud Angel of the Festival.

Now, this title has little real impact on things; I receive the same benefits as Friends of the Festival, and a nice little tax deduction. But I feel happy knowing that, in my own tiny little way, I’ve contributed to the running of this most wonderful Festival machine.

There’s other occasional perks: sometimes there’s the opportunity to sit in a dress rehearsal, or a media preview. Pre- or post-show Q&A sessions. All things that I can rarely take advantage of, given my scheduling of other shows.

But this year I’d been sent two gold wristbands for express opening-night access to the Festival’s nightspot, Barrio. We’d been introduced to the concept at the Festival launch the previous October, and it was mighty enticing; I figured it’d be worth a quick look around post-Morricone, and then maybe duck back to The Garden to see Mojo Juju. Such optimistic thinking…

Open Sesame...

By the time we’d applied our wristbands and walked up to the Barrio entrance, the public queue was already looping back on itself three times, and stretching back down King William Street; it was already obvious that Barrio was going to be every bit as popular as its Persian Garden and Red Square ancestors, and it felt gloriously indulgent and audacious to stroll past the impatient masses, wristbands on display, and straight inside. The Gravity & Other Myths crew were controlling the shrine: a brief chat, and then we were off, exploring Barrio’s maze like inwards.

We quickly figure out the lay of the land – the food stalls, the bars, the open spaces – and it’s the second drink that cements the favourite dispensary: I think it was a Dirty Mule, but after three or four of them it was pretty hard to remember. Some more wandering took us into another little mazelet; two girls with thick german accents begged me to accept their offer of a two-dollar makeover. Five minutes later, my hair teased skyward and heavy with hairspray, I left their makeshift salon with a cardboard sign around my neck that screamed “HUG ME”. I thought nothing more of it… until someone hugged me unannounced.

Go on, then...

So I figured it was only appropriate to keep score. By the end of the night, my little sign indicated that I’d received eleven hugs from women, twelve hugs from men, and one hug from someone dressed as a cartoonish shark. And one of those male hugs was from Paul Grabowsky, who had attempted to scoot past me in a narrow corridor, incredulous eyebrow raised. My Event Buddy had summoned him back; “this is all your doing,” I decreed, “so the least you can do is follow the rules.”

The gates are thrown open to the public – our gold wristband exclusivity is over, and Barrio becomes jam-packed, with bar queues approaching silliness. Seb is there, adding colour and wackiness to proceedings. The bands started cycling through my increasingly murky drunken haze. Slumping into the seating in front of the stage, I eventually figure out the indicators for the toilets – a humorous touch.

I got completely pissed.

James Thiérrée is incredible on the dance floor; we wind up talking to a dancer & tour manager of Gardenia, amongst many other people – punters and performers alike.

And I distinctly remember sitting there – on that comfortably balmy night, with my gaudy strands of beads and freaky hair and “hug me” sign and Dirty Mule and sozzled brain – thinking “Yep. This is what philanthropy feels like.”

Barrio – brilliant idea, fantastic execution. And, what’s more, I’m betting it was a tidy little earner for everyone involved.

[2012073] Ennio Morricone Live

[2012073] Ennio Morricone Live

Ennio Morricone, Adelaide Symphony Orchestra, Adelaide Festival Chorus @ Elder Park

7:30pm, Fri 2 Mar 2012

Right up front: this was one of the most glorious performances I’ve ever seen. Ever.

But so much of any discussion surrounding this event is going to be mired in negativity, because… well, because of scheduling. Because of expectations. Because of elitism and class warfare.

So let’s get the grief out of the way first.

As everyone in Adelaide knows, the third month of the year is colloquially known as Mad March – because most of the major events in the city all take place at the same time. Yes, there’s the Fringe and the Festival, but there’s also (amongst other things) the Clipsal 500 (a touring car race weekend) and, in more recent years, SoundWave (a touring music festival, whose 2013 lineup looks fantastic). The date for Ennio Morricone was announced prior to the Festival launch (sometime around August, if I recall correctly), but – after SoundWave settled on that same Saturday night for its Bonython Park metal-fest, the Festival Board leapt into action and brought Morricone forward a day.

In announcing the rescheduling of the event, a letter was sent out (sometime in November) to people who’d already bought tickets; the Festival’s Artistic Director, Paul Grabowsky, signed his name after the following statement: “We can’t afford to take any risks in the presentation of Ennio Morricone. This is a once in a lifetime experience for our audience and the sound quality must be of the highest level. As much for the sake of our distinguished artists as for our patrons, our standards cannot be compromised.”

Which, in retrospect, indicates that maybe, just maybe, someone didn’t check the city’s event calendar.

Because, when the ASO and a massive chorus fired up under Morricone’s direction, it was only a matter of minutes into the performance before the sounds of car racing on the other side of the city started seeping in.

Now, I saw the funny side of it. I smiled when the silver-tops directly in front of me tutted and harrumphed noisily, turning around to try and spy the aural incursion. I smiled when they shifted in their seats, seemingly seething in aged anger, as an ambulance tore down King William Road, siren blaring. I choked back a giggle as they pulled faces and pointed, enraged, at a plane flying overhead.

I found all that amusing because, clearly, some people had gone to an outdoor concert and expected pristine listening conditions. I, certainly, did not: I want to believe that I live in a living, breathing city, whose denizens are vibrant and able to create wonderful experiences… of which this concert was one. There is only so much of the city one can reasonably expect to control.

Which is why, during one of the softer closing pieces of the second bracket, I was the one who furiously seethed when some utter fuckwit in the Festival Centre allowed their staff to perform their bottle collection procedure, accompanied by a torrent of clanking and smashing of glass.

Because that act was under the reasonable purview of event management. And that act was worth getting upset over.

But there was precious little mention of that in the media. Instead, class warfare broke out in the comments on this Adelaide Now story after Clipsal patrons took umbrage to one of their races being cut short (allegedly due to a phone call from the Premier, who attended Morricone’s performance).

And, whilst I personally find car racing to be unattractive to the point of loathing, I can completely understand where those people are coming from. And, amidst their cultural ignorance, they do bring up some valid points: Clipsal is financially worth far more to the State than the Festival.

That doesn’t stop me becoming depressed over those comments, because this culture clash will inevitably continue for some time to come… and it feels like there are two warring factions that are completely unprepared to give an inch. And, of course, the biggest disgrace (from my point of view) was that Festival Centre cleanup crew…

But you know what? In retrospect, none of what I wrote above matters in the slightest. Because, under Morricone’s tutelage, the ASO and the Chorus created utterly spellbinding renditions of the conductor’s compositions. The pieces that were intimately familiar to me (the soft and sad lullaby of The Sicilian Clan, and the pulsing noir of Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion) were mesmerising, and the less familiar pieces – most notably the spaghetti western scores – were a joy to drink in. My pleasure was undoubtedly buoyed by our proximity to the stage – our seats were in prime position, and my trusty opera glasses had me watching Morricone’s movements (and the response of the ensemble) like a hawk.

By the end of the programme, I was thrilled – clanking of glass aside, I’d really enjoyed myself. But then came the encores…

Oh. My. God.

There’s a couple of aural ticks that I find emotionally overwhelming: power and depth of sound. Interweaving vocal lines. Bold string notes. And as Morricone kept returning to the stage, to conduct encore after encore, these ticks became more and more evident: and, I swear, that final piece was written, conducted, and performed just for me. A wall of sound, a choral tidal wave, swelling strings…

And all of a sudden I was on my feet. I had to stand and applaud; it seemed utterly inconceivable to me that I could do otherwise. With joyful tears streaming down, breath juddering from weeping, four times I stood and raised my hands in the air, applauding all who created that experience for me.

That was the first time I’ve given anything a standing ovation. There were some acts in the past that, in retrospect, I felt a little guilty about not having contributed to a Standing O, but… now I know what it feels like. To feel utterly compelled to show my appreciation.

And, as we joined the stream of people leaving Elder Park, my Event Buddy gave me a moment to clean myself up; to mop up those distilled tears of joy. “So,” she eventually said, “you enjoyed it?”

All I could do is burst into another happy fit of weeping. And it seems odd that the strongest memories of that magical performance would be of the tears – but I can still feel them now, hot and delicious and uncontrolled and glorious. And they remind me of that sound – not of cars or bottles or sirens or airplanes, but of strings and voices and wind, all controlled by the tiny baton held by a diminutive Italian man.

Magical.

[2012072] Binge Thinking

[2012072] Binge Thinking

Xavier Toby @ Gluttony – Funny Pork

5:00pm, Fri 2 Mar 2012

I knew nothing about Xavier Toby, but I was attracted by three simple words in his précis – “we’re getting dumber,” he proposes. A favourable early timeslot on an otherwise awkward evening ensured that I got a chance to sample his wares, as I shared a near-capacity Funny Pork tent with a less-than-pleasant sticky humidity.

Toby’s got a pleasant, straight-up Australian style, and he opened strongly: a dolphin-fucking joke that just kept on giving in more and more outlandish ways. Eventually the absurdity peters out, and he settles in on the story that forms the core of the show: a dinner party with Xavier and three old mates and their wives, the group catching up after not having seen each other for seven years.

There’s a nice use of props as Toby introduces the other six people at dinner via their drinks: a pair of decent-quality wines, a longneck of Pale paired with a bottle of Frangelico, and a cask of red coupled with a bladder of something indescribable. Topics of conversation are introduced via the Three Things You Don’t Discuss – religion, politics, and money – leading to jokes about the catholic church, asylum seekers, and the environment. Xavier poses himself as the reasonable outcast, poking fun at the strongly held beliefs of the other couples; but, in doing so, he essentially ostracises himself from everyone else at the dinner party… which itself proves to be a great source of amusement.

I quite enjoyed Xavier Toby’s work: though his style doesn’t really stand out from a plethora of other Australian comedians, his material tended to be a little more intelligent than average. The act still needs a little bit of trimming – something Toby himself is aware of, as he butters us up: “I like you guys – you laugh at the funny jokes, and are quiet at the rest.” But by my reckoning, there was at least forty minutes of solid laughter in there, making this a pretty worthwhile effort.

[2012071] The Origin of Species by means of natural selection or the survival of (r)evolutionary theories in the face of scientific and ecclesiastical objections: being a musical comedy about Charles Darwin (1809-1882).

[2012071] The Origin of Species by means of natural selection or the survival of (r)evolutionary theories in the face of scientific and ecclesiastical objections: being a musical comedy about Charles Darwin (1809-1882).

Tangram Theatre @ Holden Street Theatres – The Studio

1:00pm, Fri 2 Mar 2012

I was tempted – when facing of the longest show title I’ve ever typed – to produce the shortest possible post that captured my memories of my experience. But that’d just be restricting myself for style’s sake, and no-one’s going to read this anyway… so, as always, I’ll just dump my memories out here unfettered.

As the audience files into The Studio, John Hinton (who also wrote the piece) sits at a desk peering through his microscope; he glances up to greet us, referring to us as “specimens”, and occasionally checks to see whether we’d brought our own quills. One we’re all seated, he recants a brief recap of Charles Darwin‘s life, leading up to the publication of On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (including the rush necessitated by Wallace‘s pending publication – I’ve been listening to lots of SGU lately, so this was vaguely familiar to me).

Starting with Darwin’s progression through a series of schools and professions (guided by his father), the play spends a lot of time with Professor Henslow and Darwin’s travels on the Beagle (the conversations between Darwin and the ship’s captain, Fitzroy, are brilliant fun). Once Darwin returns home to Britain, he marries his cousin, briefly explains the contents of Origin of Species to us, before a silly (in a good way) de-evolutionary denouement.

There’s certainly no fourth wall in this performance, as Hinton involves the audience on many occasions, getting his “specimens” to play the part of finches – miming to bird songs, or even mating. Whilst I suspect that though the disappointingly thin crowd numbers (only a dozen or so) obviously impeded his set pieces somewhat, Hinton still produces a wonderful comic presentation – Darwin is presented with great self-awareness, and his ability to snap between characters (most noticeably Darwin, his father, and Fitzroy) is occasionally mixed up for maximum laughs. And there’s a smattering of songs scattered throughout, with some fun rhythm mangling going on as Hinton plays acoustic guitar and sings with great expression.

You’ve got to respect a performer who has a show with thirty words in the title (especially when the Fringe Guide blurb is limited to fifty!) – that shows a faith in their audience, and a confidence in the work. Luckily, the performance absolutely deserves that confidence: it’s intelligent, witty, fast-paced, and a lot of fun.

[2012070] Aladdin and his Magic i-Pod

[2012070] Aladdin and his Magic i-Pod

Jally Entertainment @ Holden Street Theatres – The Arch

11:00am, Fri 2 Mar 2012

I first encountered Jally through a quick 2009 show; I was sufficiently impressed that I figured I’d support the company where possible. So when I saw Aladdin in the program, I pencilled it in; after a cancelled show on Monday, I blagged my way into this sold-out performance, very tired and dishevelled from the previous evening.

Of course, in leveraging a late-morning matinée I essentially committed myself to watching the performance with school groups; and, given Aladdin‘s target audience, that meant I was sharing The Arch with 110 young school children, whose raucousness got a bit much for my aching head at times. But that’s fine: their enthusiasm undoubtedly heightened my enjoyment, too.

Which is just as well, really, because Aladdin and his Magic i-Pod was clearly aimed squarely at a much younger age group. The concessions to modernity, whilst still paying heed to the original tale, come early on in the production, as Aladdin trades his lamp(!) to Mr Dodgy (at the Bad Bad Guys store) for a magic carpet (complete with fleas).

Yep, there’s a fair bit of crossover.

After convincing Mr Dodgy’s sister that the “magic” carpet is broken, Aladdin manages to exchange the rug for a magic iPod; and lo, out of the iPod comes Jean Genie (whose every appearance triggers a played-for-disdainful-laughs dance by the cast to the chorus of Bowie’s classic). Of course, the Bowie reference is lost on the kids (and even some of the younger teachers present), but the constant callback to the joke works: they’re soon bouncing around with glee at repeat playings.

In fact, the kids really seemed to love the show – big, bold, and colourful, and full of fun sequences that got the kids yelling out in a pantomimic frenzy. Aladdin’s misheard wishes – a big shark, a giant moose who likes juice – had the younger audience almost beside themselves in glee… and that made this big kid smile. And hey, I enjoyed myself too – if only because of the curious looks I got from some of my younger neighbours when I joined in the yelling.

Like I said, this big kid had fun :)

[2012069] Raoul

[2012069] Raoul

La Compagnie du Hanneton @ Festival Theatre

8:00pm, Thu 1 Mar 2012

After the Festival Launch in October 2011, Raoul was the show I was most inspired by… and its presence at the front of the Festival Guide seemed to cement its regard within the Festival hierarchy.

So imagine my surprise when I started seeing flyers and scribbles at AC Arts advertising $15 tickets for Raoul – on opening night, no less – for artists. That surprise was doubled when Festival Theatre was most certainly not sold out… in fact, from our position it was possible to spot long strings of empty seats scattered throughout the stalls.

Puzzling – a near-flagship-status show for the Festival begging for a crowd on opening night?

(I later discovered – after chatting with members of the Festival Board – that they felt that Raoul wasn’t clearly defined to the consumer… that the average Festival punter didn’t know exactly what the show was. Was it theatre? Opera? Dance?)

No matter… as the performance begins, a hauntingly beautiful set composed of pipes and wisps of fabric and dreams stands silently on the left of the stage; James Thiérrée, dressed like a shipwreck survivor, enters his home, and proceeds to mime aspects of domesticity. But his comic interpretations are interspersed by his house slowly crumbling, his magical traversals through the set, or – more impressively – by the appearance of other creatures.

And the creatures themselves are gorgeous works of whimsy, possessing their own personalities as they share the stage with Raoul – the wormy thing (the programme suggests it was a fish, but my memory likes “worm” better) was a delight, but the real joy came from the armoured bug (which I noted as an electric eel). The bug’s scuttling motions (the machinations of which were laid bare for the audience at the end of the performance) had a tangible sense of character that none of the following creatures could match, though the jellyfish nearing the end of the performance was visually stunning.

As these interactions marked time, the set would peel away and re-shape itself: pipes would clatter, sheets would sweep across the stage to their new positions. Eventually, there’s almost nothing left; suddenly, the stage is blacked out and Raoul, picked out by a spotlight, starts flying above the stage and the first few rows of the audience. The spotlight pulls out, showing the stage techs operating the hoist that keeps Raoul aloft; back on the ground again, Thiérrée dismisses the applause the techs receive by covering them with a curtain.

And that was pretty much it. At the end of the day, Raoul seemed to be an evocative blend of theatre, circus, and magic, all infused with dance sensibilities.

Now, there’s no doubting that Raoul is a spectacular visual experience – watching the deconstruction of the set caused my engineering neurons to light up in glee, and whenever Thiérrée disappeared from the set I found myself searching frantically, trying to figure out where (and how) he would re-emerge. It was like watching a magic show accented with technical wizardry. And there’s also little argument that Thiérrée himself is a fantastic performer (and designer, and director): as a nearly mute comic he has an incredible presence (befitting of the grandson of Chaplin), and the way in which he moves makes him seem as light as air.

But there’s also periods where the spectacle slows up, where the “story” is allowed to progress… and, despite the claims of the programme, there really didn’t feel like there was much of a story to be consumed. Or maybe I’m just too dim to recognise that the set, and the creatures within it, were symbolic of Raoul’s mental fragmentation.

Regardless, about halfway through the performance I realised that I was not connecting with the story… and that’s fine, I reasoned: I’m perfectly happy to forgo plot for spectacle, as long as the spectacle remains. But for me, Raoul‘s failing was that there were too many periods when I was not being visually amazed… and that, dare I say it, left me feeling impatient – as I waited for the next element of wonder to be shown to me.

And, as I left the theatre, I couldn’t help but think that Raoul presented an exceptional example of (deep breath) style over substance.

Later that evening, in the Fringe Club, I engaged in much debate over Raoul with those who had enjoyed it far more than I. But, tellingly, one of the more ardent supporters of the show’s merits admitted “it was like a Dr Brown show, but with a ten million dollar budget.”

And that feels pretty apt.

[2012068] Nostalgia For Reality

[2012068] Nostalgia For Reality

SSSR @ Adelaide Town Hall – David Spence Room

6:00pm, Thu 1 Mar 2012

What the fuck.

I mean… really: what the fuck.

Those three words – and, for convenience (and emphasis), those Three Words again are “what the fuck” – perfectly describe the experience of Nostalgia For Reality… because I really have no idea what I sat through that evening.

I don’t usually take comps or freebies to shows, but my Event Buddy – with whom I was seeing Raoul later in the evening – had acquired a pair of tickets for Nostalgia For Reality after being accosted by some Russians in the Mall. With nothing else planned, I checked my copy of the Guide… and, sure enough, I’d scribbled a question mark (and some other unreadable marks) next to the show’s blurb. I figured that those scribbles meant that the show was under consideration, so I agreed to go gratis.

The David Spence Room was set up in an odd configuration: audience seating lined three walls, giving the impression that the show would be presented in the round. No lights are dropped as two men (from the five-strong Russian troupe) appear, colourful shirts poking through plain vests… they’re jovial and smiling. Through toothy smiles and sweeping actions, they welcome us to the show – before telling us about their impending heart attacks. Furthermore, they tell us, their approaching deaths are our fault… they feel too much pressure to perform, you see. They feel fear because of us. It’s all our fault.

And, less than two minutes into the performance, I’m feeling unbelievably disconnected and… well, horrified. You see, my Event Buddy – the provider of these tickets – had recently (a fortnight ago) lost a dear, close friend to a heart attack. And I could barely imagine what was going through her mind as these smiling men repeated, over and over, that their heart attacks were our fault.

The rest of the audience shifted nervously in their seats, too, but the performance carried on; the awkward opening gives way to some odd tumbling, before two gorgeously attired women appeared (the long red dress was stunning, and the green thing with the flappy bits was the manifestation of joy) as more oddball dialogue was delivered. But there didn’t really seem to be any connection, any flow, between the vignettes…

And then the two puppet heads appeared, engaged in their own non sequitur… and that’s the first time my mind shaped those Three Words. The stage used for their puppetry spins around to reveal another female performer hidden within. The group all try to engage the audience in a bridal waltz… the looks of sheer discomfort from the crowd were completely understandable, considering I probably looked the same as I twice declined their gentle invitations to join them in the dance.

I just really, really wanted to get out of that room.

But then came the closing piece: a series of projected images and videos that the group had recorded during their time in Adelaide. These projections recorded the responses of other people to their advances in the Mall… the same advances that were made to us. And their responses looked exactly like ours – “oh dear,” their faces said, “this is very odd. I don’t believe I am unsafe, but I really don’t want this weird colourful Russian near me. Oh shit, there’s a camera.” I suspect the intention was to create a sense of melancholy, but – as the troupe stood there and watched the projections with us – it just felt… well, what the fuck.

It’s clear that this performance comes from a place that I’m not familiar with. There’s such conviction and dedication in the performers’ efforts that I’m left in no doubt that this type of presentation is a more prevalent art-form in Russia. But for me – uneducated and ignorant – it was a disjointed mess of non sequiturs, obscure abstractions, and overwrought sentimentality.

Sometimes you leave a show with your Event Buddy, and you’ll turn to look at each other and just burst into laughter; that mirth comes from equal measures of relief and bewilderment, tinged with the acknowledgement that you’ve just shared An Experience. There was no such laughter at the end of Nostalgia For Reality; we silently walked towards our next venue. Eventually, after a few blocks, I had to break the deafening silence that surrounded us: “let us never speak of it again,” I said.

“Yes,” my Event Buddy agreed.