[2013112] Andrew McClelland’s Hang the DJ

[2013112] Andrew McClelland’s Hang the DJ

Andrew McClelland & DJ Ian Bell @ The Garden of Unearthly Delights – The Deluxe

11:30pm, Fri 8 Mar 2013

After the musical debacle of my previous show, some palate-cleansing was required; and, due to scheduling constraints, this wound up being the only time I could see what Andrew McClelland was up to with Hang the DJ. In retrospect, this was another example of a Happy Scheduling Accident, because it was the perfect tonic.

Hang the DJ is, essentially, a comedy show about music – but, more importantly, the culture around DJ-ing. McClelland and (ex-?) Adelaidean Ian Bell, both professional disc-spinners, have created a cohesive series of anecdotes covering all stages of a musical career – starting with their early musical passions, moving through concert experiences, meeting famous stars (some great photos in their slideshow), and tragic DJ gigs (with bizarre wedding song requests).

And whilst they profess to work as professional pop manipulators, it’s amazing to see how they light up when they start speaking of their favourite bands – english indie from the eighties and various shades of metal light up the stage. There’s also a gem of a moment when they pluck a punter from the audience and attempt to teach him to DJ by running two tunes together… good-natured laughs abound.

There’s the occasional preachy aside: you can hear the initial germ of McClelland’s “music snobbery” tirade in Episode 16 of the (sadly long-departed) Nonstopical podcast (it starts about 10:02 in). And, truth be told, it’s his comedy background that keeps the show together; Bell is a bit stiff with his delivery, and when he’s left to tell a story by his lonesome it can come across a bit flat. When the two engage in back-and-forth banter, it can feel a bit forced… when they’re sticking to pre-written material. But when they venture off-script, the dialogue bounces pleasingly, and the performance feels a lot more honest.

Apart from the cluster of chatty drunkards sitting behind us, I really enjoyed Hang the DJ – the content ticked all the right boxes, and the selection of tunes that McClelland and Bell presented was fantastic (and I almost rue the fact that we didn’t hang around for their dance party after the show). And, as we left The Deluxe, my Event Buddy realised that the clock had rolled past midnight, and that it was now my birthday… the birthday hug came from nowhere, and was a beautiful way to start the day :)

[2013111] Van Dyke Parks

[2013111] Van Dyke Parks

Van Dyke Parks, Daniel Johns, Kimbra (with Adelaide Art Orchestra) @ Thebarton Theatre

8:00pm, Fri 8 Mar 2013

I’ll be (as always) dead honest – all I knew of Van Dyke Parks prior to this Festival performance was gleaned from his mention on John Safran’s Music Jamboree… and even then, I’d glossed over some of the more impressive points (like his work with The Beach Boys). But when his name appeared during the Festival launch, I immediately knew that I had to see his show, dangerous lack of knowledge be damned.

I arrived at Thebby almost an hour early – a result of surprisingly optimal public transport – and meandered about a bit before heading into the mostly-empty theatre. As I approached my aisle seat, the only other person within about five rows of me was sitting in the adjacent position; I apologised, tried to assuage her that I was not, in fact, trying to creep her out, and sat down.

And that’s how I met Helen, who became a treasured Festival Friend over the following week-and-a-bit as we kept bumping into each other at Festival shows.

Helen and I chat and compare notes about other shows as the theatre fills up. I was surprised that the average age of the crowd was much younger than I’d expected; that’s when I learnt about Parks’ Special Guests for the evening, Daniel Johns and Kimbra (I really should pay more attention sometimes). I surmised that a large chunk of the crowd were here for them, rather than Parks.

So there was a fair wodge of applause when Kimbra took to the stage, with a further escalation when Johns joined her; the construction of their opening tune is lush, and when Van Dyke Parks joined them onstage, there’s a round of appreciative applause… for this is the man who assembled this talent.

But from there, it was a pretty steady decline in terms of my appreciation. Parks seemed to want to wallow in a sense of Americana, and between songs would wander into explanatory diatribes that – in trying to explain the relevance of his songs to Australians – bordered on the patronising. Johns and Kimbra drifted on- and off-stage as needed during Parks’ works, providing vocal (and occasionally musical) backing, and the Adelaide Art Orchestra were sterling throughout: a thankless task for them, since there were often long periods where they were required to remain stationary whilst Parks dribbled on or performed his tunes solo on the piano.

But the most memorable part of the performance, for me, had little to do with the performers. At the start of the second set, Parks appeared and urged the audience to watch the show through their eyes, not their cameras; not only was the recording of the show not allowed, he explained, but the performers deserved your full attention… and on this (and, quite possibly, only this) we agreed. But as Daniel Johns took to the stage and – with Kimbra’s intermittent help – performed a sizeable chunk of Silverchair material, a chap just across the aisle from me started recording the show. Eyes darting for signs of security, he’d hold his phone close to his chest, peeking at it awkwardly every minute or so to check the framing of his shot.

After a couple of songs, I decided to to be a busybody. I ducked across the aisle and whispered in his ear “Come on, mate, you’ve been asked not to record – put it away.” He glanced towards me, startled, but I was already slinking back to my seat; a few minutes later and a security guard was by his side. But, having performed what I thought was my moral duty, I was only left to observe the further descent into crapulence that was the Van Dyke Parks experience.

To be fair, though, there were a couple of standout performances: some of Johns’ Silverchair work came across really well (to massive cheers from the audience), and Parks performed an Allen Toussaint number and a rendition of A Night in the Tropics (written in 1857) that were genuinely great. Unfortunately, the latter also demonstrated some of the confusion inherent in the presentation. “The best is yet to come,” Parks had said, in explaining to us that music is always getting better; but he then proudly announces that Tropics is over a hundred years old… surely that implies that he’s choosing less good songs to perform? It certainly felt like it.

And the closing bracket? Awful. “Put on your sailin’ shoes,” Parks nasally droned over a plinky plonk piano piece, while the AAO sat uncomfortably – criminally – onstage, before a butchered couple of notes from Waltzing Matilda were dropped in.

Performance over, Helen and I looked at each other in sheer disbelief. And, as we left the theatre, the chap with the camera who I’d verbally prodded tapped me on the shoulder.

“Hey, man, sorry about that before,” he said.

“Well, you were recording when you’d been explicitly asked not to.”

“Nah… I wasn’t recording it for me. I was recording it for my Dad. He’s in hospital with cancer. It’s all OK… I’m not going to upload it or anything. I just didn’t want you to think I was doing anything wrong.”

“Sorry, mate, but you were recording. You shouldn’t have been. The artist even asked you not to. In my books, that’s wrong. But what I think doesn’t matter.”

I turned and walked away; in my wake, I heard a feeble “Fuck you.”

I felt righteous. That seems unbelievably petty, but that’s how it really felt.

But back to the performance: it strikes me as hilarious that some recounts I’ve read of this performance have lauded it so unequivocally. They’ve all spoken with deep knowledge of the work presented.

But, to this uninitiated n00b whose knowledge of all three performers was extremely limited, this show was a complete and utter dud.

I spent a good two-thirds of the show laughing at the show. The insertion of Waltzing Matilda was ridiculous – a completely jaw-dropping “really? really?” moment that would raise a cynical eyebrow had Justin Bieber attempted it, but is apparently regarded by some breathless commentators as the greatest thing to ever happen to bilateral relations.

And that’s just bullshit.

There were two good things that came out of this show: the Adelaide Art Orchestra’s performance was exemplary throughout, and Helen has proved to be a cracking friend. As for Van Dyke Parks and friends? Let us never speak of them again.

[2013110] Desperately Seeking the Exit

[2013110] Desperately Seeking the Exit

Peter Michael Marino @ Austral Hotel – Red Room

6:00pm, Fri 8 Mar 2013

The précis for Desperately Seeking the Exit certainly build up a significant amount of intrigue, outlining the failure of a West End musical… and in a stinking hot room, in front of bugger all people (my memory seems to think there was an audience of three), Peter Michael Marino fills in the gaps, effectively laying bare his biggest passion… and his biggest failure.

Marino’s passion was the 1985 Madonna acting vehicle Desperately Seeking Susan. Green inspiration leads him to believe that a musical theatre adaptation of the movie would be a brilliant idea; friends in New York agreed with him, and so he set to work creating a script. Excitement is amplified by the acceptance of the musical for a West End debut, Marino moves to London to oversee the casting and rehearsals, and…

…then it all goes pear-shaped. Painfully pear-shaped. Pineapple-shaped, if you will.

Marino’s recollections of the West End process would be devastating, were they not so comical; production meetings and endless re-write requests create both laughs and genuine pity, as he attempts to overcome the variances in trans-Atlantic mannerisms and work ethics. The tangles Marino got into with the director – and Debbie Harry – almost defy belief.

Surprisingly, Desperately Seeking the Exit turned out to be a real emotional rollercoaster of a ride; Peter Michael Marino certainly puts his all into the performance, with a very dynamic and engaging delivery. And whilst there are some moments of sheer brilliance in the script, there’s sometimes too many sideways steps: a rollicking tale may be interrupted by Marino’s musings on tea breaks. And those moments threaten to kill the momentum of the script a little… luckily, there’s so much quality and goodwill generated by the rest of the script that it’s possible to almost forget those issues. But a quick tweak, lopping out five minutes of material, would make this show wall-to-wall gold.

[2013109] Shakespeare for Kids

[2013109] Shakespeare for Kids

Recycled Theatre Company @ Holden Street Theatres – The Studio

11:00am, Fri 8 Mar 2013

Without performing any actual statistical analysis, I think the two most common phrases on this blog are “I love dance, but I know nothing about it” and “I love me some Shakespeare”. But whilst I was well served in the dance department in 2013, there were slim pickings when it came to The Bard’s work… which resulted in me and my hangover scurrying out to Holden Street for a much-too-early session of Romeo and Juliet, in the only session that could still fit into my Schedule (Hamlet, The Tempest, and A Midsummer Night’s Dream were also performed by the company in various other times).

And whilst I was happy enough, my hangover was super grumpy when, after a lazy twenty of us were seated in The Studio, Holden Street staff announced that the show would be delayed to allow time for a school group to arrive. A school group of seventy-six, held up by a traffic jam on Manton St.

After the inevitable frustration and rudeness involved with two busloads of school kids seating themselves – screeching teachers ahoy – the members of Recycled Theatre eased into their all-ages adaptation of Romeo and Juliet. The cast were clad in plain white, and each played multiple characters, identified by the addition of colourful props – capes, shawls, scarfs, and hats being the easiest markers. And, whilst some of the language is thinned out and modernised to be digestible by the younger audience, the plot largely remained intact… until we get to the violence at the end of the play, which again was lightened a little.

Having said that, the production – perhaps necessarily – spends a lot more time on the smaller, sillier scenes, steering focus away from all but the most significant (and well known) of the more character-driven conversations; that seemed to be a pretty good decision, with the majority of the kids’ attention being held by the use of slapstick and stage tomfoolery.

In fact, the worst elements of audience behaviour – always a concern when one attends school day matinées – were from adults; front-row parents attempting to record the entire play on their fucking iPad. Not only did the audience-facing screen become an immense annoyance, but they started walking in front of the seating bank to get better shots! Thankfully, the Narrator of the show gently put her in her place… but seriously, people who bring an iPad out in the middle of a theatre piece should be drawn and quartered – that may seem extreme, but I’m sure The Bard would approve.

But I digress: this rendition of Romeo and Juliet was entertaining (in a twee kind of way), true to the premise of the work, and – hopefully – a not-off-putting introduction to Shakespeare for a new generation. Would I do another Shakespeare for Kids show, though? Maybe not – but, if forced to choose between this and no-Bard-at-all, this would win hands-down.

[2013108] FACTY FACT – A Late Night Comedy Game Show

[2013108] FACTY FACT – A Late Night Comedy Game Show

The FACTY FACT Crew @ The Tuxedo Cat – Cat Bowl (?)

11:00pm, Thu 7 Mar 2013

After briefly chatting to Dave Warneke at Festival Fishbowl the previous Monday, I decided to slot FACTY FACT into the Schedule; the Rhino Late Show line-up didn’t really appeal that evening, and a late-night quiz show – coupled with a more appealing cast of comedians – seemed like an interesting way to round out a day.

But we’re heading into the part of FF2013 where my memory is becoming permanently sozzled, and my notes are… well, lacking. As a result, I’ve got not much to write about, other than the fact that Warneke’s quiz questions relied heavily on audiovisual content (awkwardly projected onto a side wall), and contained a lot of references to porn. The two teams – Alasdair Tremblay-Birchall captained Danny McGinlay and Tommy Dassalo, with Geraldine Quinn leading DeAnne Smith and Simon Taylor – sparred in a good-natured manner, with the two captains and Warneke having a wonderful understanding… theirs is clearly a glorious working relationship.

But as for the non-porn content? Can’t remember much at all… I can’t even remember which team won. I do recall that McGinlay was much more subdued in a group setting than in his own show earlier that evening, and Dassalo – whose work I’ve enjoyed, but not to the extent where I’d seen him recently – did such a good job ad libbing that his show got bumped up in priority. But I know that I left this instance of FACTY FACT pretty cheery, and the format is a decent change-up from the more typical late-night ensemble show, so I reckon I’ll be FACT-checking again in the future.

[2013107] Play Actually – A Non Rom Com

[2013107] Play Actually – A Non Rom Com

Tim Monley and Katy Houska @ The Tuxedo Cat – Cat Bowl

9:45pm, Thu 7 Mar 2013

It’s the opening night of Play Actually, and there’s not a whole lot of people in… which is a massive shame, because this was absolutely cracking good fun, with Tim Monley and Katy Houska presenting a series of sketches exploring the theme of modern courtship: from impromptu meetings to organised services, from lust to love.

Whilst there’s a thin narrative threading the sketches together, it’s the longer scenes that permit relatively incongruous topics to be explored: speed dating, self-help books, and awkward first dates all get a look-in, but it’s the exploration of relationships in virtual reality – with Houska and Monley using two inflatable sex dolls as puppet avatars – that steals the most laughs for its sheer absurdity.

That shouldn’t take anything away from the rest of the script, however: some of Monley’s pick-up tips were gloriously bad, only matched by the naïve optimism of Houska’s love advice. And the performances are absolutely spot-on: played for laughs, they veer wildly between playing-it-straight and hamming-it-up (and everywhere inbetween).

And whilst there’s no denying that Play Actually suffered from opening-night roughness (with occasional cues being nodded to their tech as they felt out the stage), there’s also no doubting the incredible chemistry that Houska and Monley have onstage. They manage to imbue all their characters – yes, even the sex dolls – with completely believable levels of smitten-ness, and their comic timing and physicality keep the laughs rolling. And that all makes for a fantastic way to spend an hour with your platonic love.

[2013106] Danny McGinlay: Hypertonic

[2013106] Danny McGinlay: Hypertonic

Danny McGinlay @ Gluttony – The Pig Pen

8:15pm, Thu 7 Mar 2013

My “planning” copy of the Fringe Guide has a wobbly circle around this show, which is my shorthand for mmmmmaybe; I’d never heard of Danny McGinlay before, but his précis looked vaguely interesting. But, more importantly, there was one word that caught my eye:

Hypertonic.

But more about that later.

McGinlay’s got a decent crowd in a sticky Pig Pen this evening, and from the moment he hits the stage he owns the room. Note that I didn’t say that he won the room over; it’s more a vibe I got from McGinlay himself. He’s got a very alpha-male presence about him that feels… well, wrong; some comics can play top-dog in a room to great success, but McGinlay’s aggressively assertive presentation didn’t seem to fit, and felt like it was more suited for a be-the-best-you-can-be seminar.

Still, as he discusses “the biggest year of [his] life” – travel stories abound, along with tales of failed TV shows and backhanded compliments to his wife – there’s a few good laughs to be had. But then he starts talking about the best hangover cure: SBS PopAsia.

Now, I’ve been on a massive K-pop bender, and so I was a little bit thrilled – and a little bit annoyed, in a this-guy-can’t-be-interested-in-my-favourite-band kinda way – when McGinlay started talking about Girls’ Generation’s Mr Taxi (from which that magic word “hypertonic” is drawn), describing the Girls’ recuperative visuals… and then detailing how he was inspired to look up the translation of the “Korean” lyrics.

The thing is, those lyrics are Japanese. Sure, he was making a point about K-pop in general, and Girls’ Generation is most certainly a K-pop group… but that video (and the rendition of the song that played at the end of the show) is Japanese. (Yes, there is a Korean version of the song, but it was never released as a single or MV.)

This annoyed me. A lot. And it seems awfully trivial, but that song in particular is how I got into K-pop. And I love the stuff now, completely and genuinely; I even went to South Korea to see a bunch of K-pop concerts, and I can trace that all back to Mr Taxi… so I’m a little protective about it.

McGinlay didn’t win me back from there – I crossed my arms with petty, superior knowledge and silently dared him to entice me back, but his alpha-male style kept him at arm’s length. But I feel completely justified: no-one mixes up my Girls.

[2013105] Chris Knight’s fUNCOMFORTABLE

[2013105] Chris Knight’s fUNCOMFORTABLE

Chris Knight @ Gluttony – The Runt

6:50pm, Thu 7 Mar 2013

Saying that a venue is half-full usually means pretty good things for a mid-week comedy show… unless you’re talking about The Runt, which holds – at most – two dozen people. And is stiflingly hot and humid. Which must be a double-whammy of discomfort for Chris Knight and his magnificent beard.

Now, I’ve got a lot of time for Knight and his brand of surrealism – it’s a wonderfully weighted presentation of a genuinely weird mind, and the pacing of his delivery never gives you an opportunity to settle… whenever you settle into some sort of comfortable comedic groove, Knight will throw out a non sequitur that leaves your brain scrabbling to compensate for the sudden change in direction.

Like I said, this is the type of stuff I like.

I am, of course, not an entire audience. And of the dozen people in The Runt this evening, I reckon that ten of them were left incredibly confused by Knight’s performance. Not “bemused”… confused.

But that’s fine by me. I get to revisit the wellspring of oddness that Chris Knight presents, and feel a little bit smug because I get it. I chuckle and I chortle, my brain squirms a bit, and I feel happy.

[2013104] My Piano and Me

[2013104] My Piano and Me

Sarah Gaul @ Gluttony – The Pig Pen

5:45pm, Thu 7 Mar 2013

I have to be honest: for the first third of this performance, I was smiling through gritted teeth. I like to give performers something to work with… I like them to think that, no matter how badly they’re doing, they’ve got a friend in the audience in me.

But I was really struggling to maintain that positivity. I’d come to this show on a whim, with no real expectations (except, perhaps, that a piano may be involved), and Sarah Gaul’s opening salvo of jokes left a lot to be desired. Tired themes, stretching for punchlines that weren’t really there… even her piano playing felt simplistic and a little clunky.

But then something changed. Some snark entered her stories; her jokes became tainted with an aggressively nasty streak. Vegan zealots were the first victims of this successful foray; then came stick-figure-car-families.

And, as her material became ever darker, as her ire increased… so did the laughs.

Now, don’t get me wrong – the slow start was almost unforgivable, and some of the musical pieces that underpin her comical songs are (charitably) crude. But when Gaul launches into a piece that starts with the ickiness of being pursued by a stalker, then turns it around by brutally murdering him… well, let’s just say that I’m very interested to see how she develops her act in the future.

[2013103] Internal

[2013103] Internal

Ontroerend Goed @ State Theatre Company Rehearsal Room

2:00pm, Thu 7 Mar 2013

I’m super early for my Internal session, and I’m excited: I know absolutely nothing about the work, and the Festival staff I chat to beforehand are giving little away… and the few snippets they do reveal intrigue me no end. “I hope everyone turns up,” one of them says; “there must be five in the audience, and yesterday there were no-shows.”

But they clam up with details thereafter, so we chat about the periphery of managing theatre-goers: about the presumed entitlement of latecomers, about people taking photos in the audience, and about how the ushers (almost always thanklessly) shut them down (including hanging around to ensure the photos/movies have been deleted).

Luckily, all five of the audience have turned up: two women, a younger couple (in their thirties?), and myself. We go downstairs, wind our way through the corridors until we reach a space with five white crosses on the floor. “Stand on them,” we’re told by our accompaniment, “and face the curtain.” We do so, giggling: the proximity of the crosses to the curtain has our noses almost touching the cloth. I’m at the far left.

The curtain lifts, and there’s five other people a foot away from us. Directly across from us. Staring at us. The eye contact is hard to break, to look down the line at the performers. After a few (tense, almost uncomfortable) moments, the performers start changing positions one-at-a-time; the tall bearded man I was originally facing is replaced by an even taller, unspeakably gorgeous woman. We look into each other’s eyes, but She’s so tall that I can’t see Her through my glasses – more over them.

She ever-so-gently slides her hand into the small of my back and guides me away from the rest of the group; on the other side of the rehearsal space are five small booths, dimly lit within but fronted by translucent black curtains. She guides me into the middle of these booths, and gestures for me to sit at the small table within; She sits opposite, Her every movement elegant and considered. Refined. We look into each others eyes, and I feel compelled to quietly say “Hello”; She just smiles back.

On the table is a small lamp, a bottle of Cointreau, and two small glasses; She pours two measures of the drink (a personal favourite), pushes one glass towards me. I pick it up, we clink glasses in a silent toast, we drink. I’m starting to hear burbles of conversation from the other booths; I feel like we should be talking, that I’m missing a cue for this interaction. “It’s much smoother on ice,” I say to Her, motioning to the drink; She just looks back at me, faint smile and those deep brown eyes.

I’m gulping, She’s sipping considerately; I finish the drink, put my glass down, then return my gaze to Her. “I’m feeling a bit lost,” I say, “Should I be… doing… something?”

She smiles, and very quietly – but firmly – says “There’s no need to talk.” Her eyes soften; She reaches for my hand and starts slowly squeezing it with Hers, running Her thumb over the back of my hand.

We stare at each other a moment, and something in her eyes changes; something flashes into my mind: we’re breaking up. This can’t work. But then She uses Her other hand to flatten mine out, and explores its shape with Her fingertips; the hand then moves up. She lightly touches my face, my hair, my neck; I’m a sucker for neck contact, so I find myself craning to allow her all the access to my neck She wants. She grabs both my hands, and we stare – deeply? – into each others eyes for a moment, before She lifts my right hand to Her face.

I trace Her jawline, Her ear, gently touch Her hair; it feels somehow wrong to be doing this, but there’s an intimacy within the space that is really blurring the lines between the performance I want to give, and the performance I think I should give. But, with our eyes still locked together, I trace Her jaw line one more time and return my hand on top of Hers; She smiles softly, encourages me from my seat, and we leave the booth.

There’s now a circle of chairs in the middle of the room, and She seats me in one of the chairs that faces all the booths; I see all the other “couples” talking, giggling; it all looks completely foreign to the experience I just had, silent and potent and tactile and a little bit uncomfortable. I feel a little jealous of them in their chatty enclaves. One by one the other couples come out and sit down; once all ten of us are seated, the performers go around the circle introducing their “dates”. I’m last in the cycle, and I realise my “date” wouldn’t know my name; Her turn comes to speak, and She smokily looks at me: “I don’t need to know his name.”

Around the circle again, the actors talk about the other’s positives: “We touched each other… in a dark place,” She says. The words look smutty on the screen as I type this, but She had imbued them with a tenderness.

Around the circle again, negatives this time: “There is nothing bad to say about him.”

Once more around… how do the performers rate their dates out of ten? Would we see them again? There’s a few scores, cheeky giggles at the discrepancies. One couple kiss; the male audient’s partner squealed in horror. One couple is shy, and they take turns whispering their thoughts to us with their opposite out of earshot; then comes my date.

She turns to face me. She flicks her hair back behind Her shoulders, reaches behind her neck; one woman on the other side of the circle gasps “oh my god” as she sees my date undo her dress. The dress is folded down, revealing Her (glorious, it must be said) bare breasts; “Is this what you wanted to see?” She said.

Confusion; I can’t look straight at them. I can’t.

But I’m honest, always honest. “Not really,” I say. The words come out quiet, nervous, probably unconvincing. Strangely enough (and, in retrospect, bucking the stereotype) all I wanted to do is look into those brown eyes again.

The dress is back on, and She takes my hand, gets me to stand; soft music starts playing, and She puts one hand on my shoulder and takes my hand in the other. I grab her waist, and we start dancing – I think I hear quiet giggles and gasps from the other four audience members, but I can’t really tell as we dance slowly and I want to pull Her in closer to me but I don’t know what my role is and She’s so tall that if I hugged her I’d be burying my face in those breasts that had recently been exposed to me and sweet jesus this feels good. Warm, comforting. I realise that the others are being encouraged to dance too; soon they’re all up, we’re all dancing. She leans down and whispers to me – “I’d like to send you something. Can I have your address?” “Sure,” I say, half intoxicated by the emotions of the experience, and I scrawl out my address without even considering what the result may be.

Eventually, the audience – the guests – are encouraged to return to the white crosses, and we face each other one last time. Three kisses on the cheek. “Goodbye.” “…Thank you.”

And the curtain drops.

We look at each other in disbelief for a moment, before the laughter begins.

As we were guided up the stairs, one of the staff members asked who my date had been; I stammered in my attempt to describe the experience. “Oh, you got the silent booth,” she grinned, and it took all the self-control I had not to blurt the secrets of Internal out in front of the next group waiting for this… almost unbelievable experience.

And then, a week later, some mail arrived.

[2013102] Wolf Creek: The Musical

[2013102] Wolf Creek: The Musical

SPUR @ Format

10:30pm, Wed 6 Mar 2013

I really loved Wolf Creek, despite the creepy guy in the near-empty cinema shifting seats directly behind me and my ex every five minutes throughout the tense parts of the movie… though I have to admit, that bloke made the nervous tension all-the-more heightened.

But a spoof of Wolf Creek, in the style of a musical? Written and performed by a bunch of Adelaide’s younger comics? That’s got to be a bit of a joke, right?

Thankfully, yes… and, even better, it’s a joke that never got old throughout the show.

Written by local comedians Demi Lardner and James McCann, the plot of the movie is somewhat adhered to, with Kel Balnaves dominating in his portrayal of backpacker-hunting Mick; he almost outshines John Jarratt’s original, with a looming physical presence and glassy-eyed intensity that never fails to amuse in its over-the-top-ness.

A lot of the humour comes from the deliberate contrasts in casting; whilst Balnaves plays it (relatively) straight, Demi Lardner’s role as the leading man (was her beard drawn on with charcoal?) is so awkwardly stilted that her portrayal of Ben as a horny Greek adonis becomes a comical highlight. But she’s fighting for that title against Chris Knights, who – in another gender-bending twist – plays a female backpacker, his bright blonde wig catching on his (most definitely real) beard.

It’s a show that celebrates its lo-fi-ness – the cardboard car (with number plates reading “W3R3FKD”) being a glorious example, along with the constant references to the clam-shilling sponsor of the show. Angus Hodge’s constant re-use for minor characters (and even inanimate objects) is well managed, and McCann’s songs are peppy numbers contrasted with vicious lyrics (especially the rape dungeon song), sung with off-key gusto by the cast, and they just work.

Wolf Creek: The Musical was a bloody brilliant bit of comic theatre, and – perversely – almost the very opposite of the show I’d seen beforehand. But, in some strange way, the thread of commonality between the two shows helped me appreciate them both even more; it was a brilliant pairing, and one of the best Happy Scheduling Accidents I’ve ever made during Mad March.

[2013101] Murder

[2013101] Murder

Erth @ Queen’s Theatre

9:00pm, Wed 6 Mar 2013

I’m not a massive Nick Cave fan, though that’s not because I dislike his work; I just haven’t been exposed to much of his music (and none of his writings). But what I have heard – stuff like The Mercy Seat and Red Right Hand – has left me with the impression that the man is capable of dark, brooding creations like no other. So when Murder was announced, insisting that it was dark-themed puppetry inspired by Cave’s Murder Ballads, I was sold; as with clowns, I’ve always imagined puppets to have a twisted existence hiding behind their public personae.

Led by a human narrator who was seeking human intimacy – but prone to violent outbursts – scenes from his imagination (or memory?) were played out with puppets. Erth’s puppets are dirty, seedy, almost grotesque characters who engage in dirty, seedy, and violent acts… because Murder is very much about Death. And Sex. And, curiously, Sex And Death, with one scene in particular turning from a vivid piece of puppet pornography into something far more vicious.

The puppetry itself was excellent, with the characters given real emotion and weight by their black-clad handlers – sometimes a simple, considered turn-of-the-head can speak volumes, and the arching of backs during the sex scene was delicious. And the selection of Cave’s music to propel the piece proved to be superb, with only occasional use of song lyrics as literal narrative devices.

The only mis-step in the production was (what felt like) a protracted video game sequence, where the sole (human) actor Graeme Rhodes engaged in cold, violent shooting with a series of projected enemies. As a gamer, this felt like a horribly hackneyed reference to the violence that can be found within the medium… the intent was good, but the implementation heavy-handed.

But the rest of the performance is spot-on, from the contrast between human and puppet actors (including a nice moment when Rhodes himself is controlled by the puppeteers), to the twist in the tale of the hitch-hiker, to the more subtly handled observances of society’s acceptance of (and obsession with) violence and murder. It was an incredibly imaginative and beautifully realised production that, whilst still a little clunky in places, was immensely satisfying to watch.

[2013100] Children / A Few Minutes of Lock

[2013100] Children / A Few Minutes of Lock

Louise Lecavalier @ Space Theatre

7:15pm, Wed 6 Mar 2013

And so show One Hundred for the season rolled around, and I was thrilled that it happened to be a Festival dance piece; as I am prone to saying, I know nothing about dance, but I love to watch it anyway… and with a curated dance piece, there’s always the assurance that someone thinks it’s pretty good, even if I miss the point.

The opening piece, Nigel Charnock’s Children, was completely lost on me… it seemed to be using the physical performance to create an impenetrable series of metaphors for something – perhaps the titular children? – but I was unable to fathom its message or intent. The movements were likewise confusing: at times Louise Lecavalier and Patrick Lamothe would be scuttling around on hands and knees, whereas other moments clearly have a more classical influence. With a mish-mash of musical backing and searing interludes (accompanied by short strobe bursts), and a simple black staging, it was really difficult to get into this piece at all.

A Few Minutes of Lock (a series of short pieces choreographed by Édouard Lock) was much more approachable, however… maybe due to the bite-sized nature of the performances. Lecavalier was joined by Keir Knight (and, later, Lamothe again) for a much more dynamic, physical display that was immediately engaging and thoroughly entertaining.

And then came the encore – a brief snippet where the dancers engaged each other with hand-slaps before the interactivity twisted their bodies into a human knot. A fleeting moment, maybe, but a wonderful highlight.

As with Guillem, Lecavalier’s movements onstage completely belie her age; though clearly less of a balletic frame than the former, Louise was capable of astonishing speed and power, yet still manages to exude a lightness, a soft touch; were it not for the overly dense opening piece, this performance would have been super-satisfying. Instead, I was left to dwell on the thirty minutes of sheer gold, and hope that the other forty minutes were meaningful to one more knowledgable in dance.

[2013099] Echolalia

[2013099] Echolalia

Jen McArthur @ Adelaide College of the Arts – Stables

6:00pm, Wed 6 Mar 2013

After working with autistic children, Jen McArthur was inspired to create Echolalia in response to observing their issues with social engagement. In doing so, she manages to conjure up a character that possesses ticks that are all-too-identifiable to the OCD part of me.

Echo is a woman who – ostensibly – is preparing for a job interview, though some of her tasks and minutiae are mired in everyday chores. The set is her house, with various bits of furniture and props constantly being arranged just so. Occasionally Echo ventures into the audience to offer someone a biscuit – no, that one – but largely we are left to watch her try and get through her daily routine.

There’s tangible fear when the phone rings, and her job agent leaves a message; there’s distracted joy as she primps herself. Though largely a mute performance, there’s also musical and dance interludes that catch Echo’s attention before she forcibly drags herself back into focus; and there’s plenty of giggles for the audience, not at Echo but with her.

And that’s the thing about Echolalia – it’s a quirky and happy physical performance that is generally uplifting for the audience, without necessarily feeling insubstantial… and the fact that Echo’s character traits occasionally mirrored my own gave it an extra little bit of impact.

[2013098] One Man, Two Guvnors

[2013098] One Man, Two Guvnors

National Theatre Great Britain @ Her Majesty’s Theatre

2:00pm, Wed 6 Mar 2013

Let it never be said that I didn’t absolutely love the first half of One Man, Two Guvnors – it was a masterful display of laugh-a-second slapstick comedy. But the problem is that this reworking of commedia dell’arte exemplum Servant of Two Masters is, at its heart, a deceitful production that takes advantage of the audience’s goodwill… and whilst there were many, many, many audience members who loved this presentation, it managed to rub me completely the wrong way.

Presented almost in a vaudevillian style, with skiffle band The Craze performing live during set changes, One Man, Two Guvnors really milks laughs through outlandish delivery, “mistakes” that remind me of Sound and Fury‘s stock trade, and plenty of fourth-wall-breaking asides to the audience. And whilst the early dalliances with the audience felt gloriously spontaneous – I’m thinking of the hummus sandwich incident, here – I started to get a little annoyed with the constant references back to the crowd: lead performer Owain Arthur’s fits of laughter at audience “responses” didn’t quite sell me – they felt loud, hammy… fake.

But the end of the first Act was a highlight for me, because it’s where everything went so right – and so seriously wrong – for the show. After “encouraging” the impeccably dressed audience member Caroline Patterson onstage, she was banished to a part of the stage where she could see nothing… and was, initially, ignored. The rest of the cast then engaged in a slapstick masterclass within a restaurant setting, with aged and infirm waiter Alfie providing guffaws of physical humour, before Patterson’s presence was exposed and she was messily caught in the crossfire of a food-fight.

Dress ruined, you could see the shock on her face as she was led into the wings at the closing of the Act.

I went to the interval thinking that they’d genuinely crossed the line. I retrospectively felt ashamed at myself for laughing so heartily at the performance; the considerable goodwill that the performance had earned was forgotten, and instead the production started the second act from within a deep, dark hole in my mind… and it was unable to claw its way out. By the end of the show, I was still feeling incredibly negative towards the show; seeing “Caroline Patterson” in the curtain call, bowing and singing the closing number, felt like a slap in the face. You’ve been cheated, my cheeks throbbed. And I don’t like that.

Talking to other people who had seen – and loved – the show confirmed that the hummus sandwich gag, as well as Ms Patterson, were indeed plants. And yes, I had some hearty laughs, and was thoroughly entertained for stretches… but that dishonesty cheapens the ordeal in retrospect, and leaves me incredibly disappointed.